Prediction of Gavin Young vs Jack Anthrop at M25 Columbus 11-15-25
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 15 Nov at 05:00 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Young vs J. Anthrop

USA
0
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
0
Win
Played
0
Win
G. Young Vs J. Anthrop Picks
Based on the implied probability from the match winner, Jack Anthrop has a 63.37% chance to get the victory.
Login / Register to find out our expert prediction.
| Match | Bookie Prediction | Bookie Odds |
|---|---|---|
| G. Young | 36.63% | 2.56 |
| J. Anthrop | 63.37% | 1.48 |
Above is implied from odds. Login / Register to find out our expert predictions with edge / profit forecast.
Head-to-head: Young 0 - 0 Anthrop
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Young | 0 |
| Anthrop | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
G. Young Vs J. Anthrop Best Odds
1x2
G. Young vs J. Anthrop H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 73.68% (28-10) | Career Total W/L | 51.19% (43-41) |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Young vs J. Anthrop Match Preview:
- Over the past six months, Gavin Young has a slight edge in second serve effectiveness, winning 39.04% of points compared to 38.84% by Jack Anthrop.
- Gavin Young shows better performance in return games recently, claiming 47.16% of opponents' second serve points, while Jack Anthrop stands at 46.72%.
- First serve return statistics reveal Gavin Young at 28.50% and Jack Anthrop at 28.40%, indicating minimal difference here.
- In terms of saving breakpoints, both players show similar capabilities with Gavin Young at 53.26% and Jack Anthrop close behind at 53.21%.
- Over the last year, Gavin Young has a better win percentage at 70.00% compared to Jack Anthrop's 60.87%, hinting at a stronger overall form.
- Considering surface preferences, both players excel on indoor hard courts with a win rate of 78%, but Jack Anthrop struggles on clay, unlike Gavin Young.
- Both players compete primarily in $10K ITF events, yet Young slightly leads with a 70.00% win rate to Anthrop's 63.64%.
- A key difference is in the quality of opponents faced, with Young competing against players averaging rank 163, significantly tougher than Anthrop’s average opponent at 314.26.
- If this match goes to a deciding set, Gavin Young has a perfect record over the last year, winning all such sets, contrary to Jack Anthrop’s 43% success rate.
- Check the current event stats for both players as it may shed more light on who might be in better form for this particular tournament.
Editorial Prediction (November 15, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Gavin Young and Jack Anthrop appears to favor Young in multiple aspects, from recent performance trends to opponent quality faced over the last year.
Gavin Young’s marginally better second serve success rate and return game statistics provide him a slight technical advantage. Furthermore, his experience against higher-ranked opponents suggests a stronger preparation for high-pressure scenarios than Jack Anthrop.
With Young's dominant record in deciding sets and his ability to adjust to various playing surfaces, the prospect of him maintaining composure and seizing opportunities seems substantial.
Though Anthrop holds a commendable record on indoor hard surfaces comparable to Young, his performance on other surfaces, such as clay, and against less formidable opponents, reduce his competitiveness slightly for this event.
Aligning these observations with each player’s capability to handle stress and adapt to different challenges, Gavin Young is most likely to emerge victorious in this match against Jack Anthrop.
Gavin Young vs Jack Anthrop Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Young Vs J. Anthrop Current Event Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Matches Played | 3 |
| 2:37:22 | Last Match Time | 2:40:34 |
| 7:51:48 | Total Time | 5:28:52 |
| 52% (14/27) | Break Points Saved | 78% (14/18) |
| 70% (30/43) | Service Hold % | 87% (27/31) |
| 63% (27/43) | Opponent Hold % | 65% (20/31) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreak Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.67 | Tiebreaks Per Match | 0.00 |
Currently displayed stats include matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer. Who do you back to make it through to the next round? We have predictions for every match in M25 Columbus.
Recent Performance Stats
G. Young Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 7-6(8) 4-6 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(3) 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 4-6 7-5 | ||
QF | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-0 6-3 | ||
J. Anthrop Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||
Where To Watch Young vs Anthrop?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Young Vs Anthrop is now available here.

G. Young vs J. Anthrop Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 77.78% (7/2) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.56% (15/12) |
| 70.00% (14/6) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.56% (35/28) |
| 57.43% (116/86) | Games Win/Loss | 51.79% (304/283) |
| 0.42 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 42 | Aces Total | 108 |
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 |
| 24 | Total Double Faults | 38 |
| 1:53:24 | Average Match Time | 1:45:53 |
| 345.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 363.52 |
| 63% (369/583) | 1st Serve % | 64% (1173/1841) |
| 72% (264/369) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (823/1173) |
| 46% (98/214) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (335/668) |
| 45% (31/69) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (74/190) |
| 44% (266/608) | Return Points Win % | 40% (762/1890) |
| 78% (7/9) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (15/27) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (4/6) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (4/9) |
| 100% (7/7) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 75% (16/12) |
| 0% (7/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 25% (16/4) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 27% (11/3) |